Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article investigates classification freedom in e-waste processing as a phenomenon that appears despite environmental risk and even though the promise of economic profit depends on strict discipline in e-waste disassembly and sorting. This paradox raises the question of what allows for classification freedom. E-waste recycling is embedded in specific registers of value shaped by a network of stakeholders: producers, e-waste processing facilities, the state, and the European Union. Building upon ethnographic research in an e-waste processing company in Czechia, I argue that the registers of value in e-waste recycling have stabilising effects on working conditions and make classification freedom possible. By elucidating the network of relations in e-waste recycling, the article sheds light on the link between stability and freedom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbora Stehlíková (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: