Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although selected chemokines act as natural inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, their inherent proinflammatory activity may limit a therapeutic use. To elucidate whether the antiviral and signaling functions of RANTES can be dissociated, several recombinant analogues mutated at the N terminus were generated and functionally compared with the wild-type (WT) molecule, as well as with three previously described mutants. Substitution of selected residues within the N-terminal region caused a marked loss of antiviral potency. By contrast, two unique analogues (C1.C5-RANTES and L-RANTES) exhibited an increased antiviral activity against different CXCR4-negative HIV-1 isolates grown in primary mononuclear cells or in macrophages. This enhanced HIV-blocking activity was associated with an increased binding affinity for CCR5. Both C1.C5-RANTES and L-RANTES showed a dramatically reduced ability to trigger intracellular calcium mobilization via CCR3 or CCR5, while potently antagonizing the action of the WT chemokine. By contrast, two previously described analogues (RANTES(3-68) and AOP-RANTES) maintained a WT ability to trigger CCR5-mediated signaling, while a third one (RANTES(9-68)) showed a dramatic loss of antiviral activity. These data demonstrate that the antiviral and signaling functions of RANTES can be uncoupled, opening new perspectives for the development of chemokine-based therapeutic approaches for HIV infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polo et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: