Why the study?
Although echocardiography and ECG-gated CT angiography are standard for diagnosing MVP, the diagnostic accuracy of non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT to predict MVP remained to be evaluated.
Does the asymmetric double line sign on non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT accurately predict the presence of mitral valve prolapse?
Does the asymmetric double line sign on non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT accurately predict the presence of mitral valve prolapse?
The asymmetric double line sign on non-ECG-gated chest CT is highly specific (99%) but only modestly sensitive (59%) for identifying mitral valve prolapse, offering a valuable incidental diagnostic clue.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-ECG-gated chest CT may incidentally flag MVP; leaves open its diagnostic role pending prospective validation.
PURPOSE: The primary imaging modality for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is echocardiography supplemented by electrocardiography (ECG)-gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) angiography. However, we have recently encountered patients with MVP who were initially identified on non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT to predict the presence of MVP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 92 patients (surgically confirmed MVP who underwent non-ECG-gated chest CT), 27 patients were excluded for motion artifact or insufficient surgical correlation, and 65 patients were ultimately included. As a control, 65 patients with dyspnea and without MVP (non-ECG-gated chest CT and echocardiography were performed within 1 month) were randomly selected. We retrospectively analyzed an asymmetric double line sign on axial CT images for the presence of MVP. The asymmetric double line sign was defined as the presence of a linear structure, not located in the plane traversing the mitral annulus. RESULTS: Use of the asymmetric double line sign to predict MVP on non-ECG-gated CT showed modest sensitivity, high specificity, modest negative predictive value, and high positive predictive value of 59% (38/65), 99% (64/65), 70% (64/91), and 97% (38/39), respectively. CONCLUSION: The asymmetric double line sign on non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT may be a valuable finding to predict the presence of MVP. Familiarity with this CT finding may lead to prompt diagnosis and proper management of MVP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Son et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: