Why the study?
What is the prognostic value of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring findings in top level athletes?
What is the prognostic value of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring findings in top level athletes?
Holter monitoring in top athletes reveals that junctional rhythms and AV blocks correlate with training intensity, whereas unusual sinus tachycardia may indicate over-training.
May reflect training load in athletes; leaves open prognostic value of routine Holter monitoring.
We used continuous electrocardiographic monitoring according to Holter's method for a tentative evaluation of the prognostic value of the main electrocardiographic peculiarities of the "athlete's heart". Five hundred and eighty-seven Holter recordings were performed in 164 top athletes divided into three groups: dynamic, static and mixed. Selection criteria were either clinical or electrical (resting-ECG). The prognostic value of arrhythmia is variable: unworrying junctional rhythm (JR) and auriculo-ventricular blocks (AVB) that disappeared under strain, which in our study interested mostly the dynamic group. No pejorative prognostic criteria were found related to supraventricular premature beats (SVPB). Ventricular premature beats (VPB) of recent occurrence were predominantly found, in our study, in the static athletes; their occurrence was not always accounted for and their prognosis, at least as regards sports, was uncertain. Holters repeated throughout the sports season made it possible to establish a relationship between some peculiarities and the training intensiveness: auriculo-ventricular block and junction rhythm culminated during intensive periods. Unusual sinus tachycardia would be indicative of over-training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carré et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: