Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A controlled study comparing CAM stimulation and occlusion therapies on 2 equally large, randomly allocated groups of 25 amblyopic children aged between 4 and 6/2 years was conducted. The main parameter of comparison was distant visual acuity. No significant difference was found between the 2 methods as regards mean improvement. By both methods 80% of the cases showed an improvement of at least 2 lines on the Snellen decimal steps chart. No case showed deterioration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nyman et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: