Why the study?
Mounting evidence supports isometric handgrip exercise to promote health outcomes, but its effectiveness in improving cognitive function in adults was uncertain.
Does isometric handgrip exercise improve cognitive function in adults?
Does isometric handgrip exercise improve cognitive function in adults?
Isometric handgrip exercise shows a potential trend toward improving chronic cognitive function, though acute effects remain inconclusive.
Acute IHE effects on cognition are inconclusive with only a tentative chronic trend; leaves open clinical utility pending larger trials.
Cognitive function is essential for most behaviors of daily living and is a critical component in assessing the quality of life. Mounting prospective evidence supports the use of isometric handgrip exercise (IHE) as a small muscle mass practice to promote health-related outcomes in clinical and healthy populations. The aim of the present review was to systematically investigate whether IHE is effective in improving the cognitive function of adults (aged ≥18 years). Studies were identified by searching five databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, PsychINFO, and Web of Science). Eight out of 767 studies met the inclusion criteria, including three types of studies: 1) acute effect for IHE with various intensity protocols ( n = 4); 2) acute effect for IHE with one set exhaustion protocol ( n = 2); and 3) chronic effect of IHE on cognitive function ( n = 2). To assess the methodological quality of studies, the PEDro scale was used (mean score = 6.75). The evidence on whether IHE exerts acute positive effects on cognitive performance is currently rather inconclusive. However, a trend was discernible that implementing IHE can generate a beneficial chronic effect on cognitive function, although the results should be interpreted with caution. The clinical relevance of IHE as a time-efficient type of physical exercise to improve cognitive function warrants further investigation. Methodology and safety considerations were discussed. Systematic Review Registration : ( https://osf.io/gbzp9 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: