The reviving interest in noncustodial penalties makes it urgent to explore the ethical limits on their use. This article explores three kinds of limits: proportionality (desert) constraints, restrictions against humiliating or degrading punishments, and concerns about intrusion into the rights of third parties. In connection with the second of these limits, the concept of “acceptable penal content” is developed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew von Hirsch (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: