Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of two oral tablet formulations of vonoprazan 20 mg in healthy male subjects under fasting conditions.
Is the test formulation of oral Vonoprazan 20 mg bioequivalent to the reference formulation in healthy male subjects under fasting conditions?
Is the test formulation of oral Vonoprazan 20 mg bioequivalent to the reference formulation in healthy male subjects under fasting conditions?
The test formulation of Vonoprazan 20 mg is bioequivalent to the reference product INZELM® 20 mg in healthy male subjects.
Supports substitution of the test vonoprazan formulation in practice; confirms bioequivalence to reference in this RCT.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) of two oral tablet formulations of Vonoprazan (VNP) 20 mg in 30 healthy male subjects under fasting conditions. Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized, open-label, balanced, two-period, two-sequence, single oral dose, and crossover study. Thirty (30) healthy subjects were assigned to one of two sequences protocol: INZELM® 20 mg, as reference product (R) sequence R-T or VNP 20 mg as test product (T) sequence T-R to period I and vice versa to period II, with a washout period between the two periods. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in plasma concentrations were determined using a validated Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Results: The results showed that 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference geometric mean ratios (GMR) of C max : 100.79% (94.55–107.44%), area under the curve (AUC) 0-t : 97.42% (92.72–102.35%), and AUC 0-inf : 97.35% (92.52–102.43%) were within the BE (80–125%) acceptance range. Conclusion: The PK profiles of INZELM® VNP 20 mg (Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited) as reference (R) product and VNP 20 mg (Laboratorios Leti, S.A.V) as test (T) product were bioequivalent. No adverse events were reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peña et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: