This study explores the interplay between traditional institutions and armed banditry in Northwest Nigeria, a region plagued by a volatile security environment characterized by various non-state armed groups. The rise of armed bandits has resulted in significant humanitarian crises, displacing millions and instilling fear within communities. This research critically examines allegations that traditional rulers collude with bandits, analysing the complexities of their relationships amid state neglect and insecurity. Through qualitative analysis, the paper highlights how traditional leaders, often seen as potential allies against banditry, are simultaneously victims of the violence they seek to mitigate. The findings suggest that the traditional institutions cannot be solely blamed for the rise of banditry; instead, they are caught in a precarious position, navigating loyalty to their communities while facing threats from armed groups. The study concludes that effective governance is crucial, urging the Nigerian government to empower traditional institutions and provide security assurances. This approach could enhance community resilience and foster collaboration between state and traditional structures in combating armed banditry, ultimately contributing to restoring peace in the region. The recommendations call for a multifaceted strategy that integrates traditional institutions into the broader security framework, recognizing their potential to contribute positively to local governance and stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sowale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: