Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
Men with coronary artery disease
Comparison
Supervised aquatic-based exercise vs unspecified comparator
Design
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Supports incorporating AqEx into CAD rehabilitation; extends conventional exercise benefits to water-based modalities.
The beneficial effect of conventional forms of exercise for people with coronary artery disease (CAD) has been widely investigated.1 Recent studies showed that less established fitness activities can also lead to health benefits.2 Among these, aquatic-based exercise (AqEx) was shown to improve cardiovascular fitness, risk profile and muscle strength in healthy and special populations.3,–5 The intrinsic properties of water have been responsible for the observed physiological effects following acute and long-term exercise interventions. During immersion at the neck level, hydrostatic pressure redirects approximately 700 ml of peripheral blood centrally, increasing cardiac preload and stroke volume.6 Recent reviews confirmed that the haemodynamic changes of AqEx are also well tolerated in stable patients with heart failure (HF), provided...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cugusi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: