Why the study?
Is the right ventricular apical electrogram suitably timed for synchronizing intracavitary cardioversion in patients with ventricular tachycardia?
Is the right ventricular apical electrogram suitably timed for synchronizing intracavitary cardioversion in patients with ventricular tachycardia?
The apical right ventricular electrogram is suitably timed for synchronizing countershock in most patients with VT, but individual verification of timing is necessary to avoid precipitating ventricular fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support RV apical electrogram for synchronized VT cardioversion in most cases; leaves open need for individualized verification in prospective studies.
An infravascular catheter positioned in the right ventricular apex has been used for intracavitary cardioversion in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia. We examined the timing of the right ventricular apical electrogram during sinus rhythm and ventricular tachycardia (VT) in order to determine if this signal could be used to synchronize the delivery of a countershock. Sixty‐three distinct morphologies of VT were observed in 33 patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing with programmed stimuiution. Regardless of VT morphology or site of origin, the bipolar right ventricular electrogram always occurred within the peripheral QRS complex during ventricular tachycardia. Relative timing occurred within the QRS rangingfrom the initial 13% of the QHS to the last 12%. When all episodes ofVT were examined, the timing of the right ventricular electrogram did not correlate linearly with the peak of the ECG, but the right ventricular electrogram occurred within 60 ms of the peak ECG in 83% of episodes of ventricular tachycardia. In one case of arrhythniogenic right ventricular dysplasia, the right ventricular electrogram occurred 160 ms after the peak ECG in ventricular tachycardia, a time when delivery of a countershock may have precipitated ventricular fibrillation. Six of these patients underwent cardioversion utilizing an intracavitary catheter and external generator. Acceleration of VT, or conversion to ventricular fibrillation, occurred following two of 27 shocks (7.4%). The right ventricular electrogram occurred the latest within the QRS complex in the two patients who developed acceleration of the tachycardia. Thus, the apical right ventricular electrogram is suitably timed for synchronizing countershock in most patients with VT, thereby enabling the use of a single intracavitary catheter system for sensing and the delivery of the countershock. However, it is necessary to verify appropriate timing of the right ventricular electrogram in each patient for all known morphoiogies of spontaneous VT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: