Key result
Non-invasive FFRCT achieved higher per-patient diagnostic accuracy than standard coronary CTA in Japanese patients with suspected CAD (74% vs. 47%, P<0.001).
Observational (n=57)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 74% vs 47%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Recently, a non-invasive method using computational fluid dynamics to calculate vessel-specific fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) from routinely acquired coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) was described. The Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps (NXT) trial, which was a prospective, multicenter trial including 254 patients with suspected coronary artery disease, noted high diagnostic performance of FFRCT compared with invasive FFR. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of non-invasive FFRCT vs. standard stenosis quantification on coronary CTA in the Japanese subset of the NXT trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 57 Japanese participants were included from Okayama University (n=36), Kyoto University (n=17), and Keio University (n=4) Hospitals. Per-patient diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT(74%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 60-85%) was higher than for coronary CTA (47%; 95% CI: 34-61%, P<0.001) arising from improved specificity (63% vs. 27%, P<0.001). FFRCT correctly reclassified 53% of patients and 63% of vessels with coronary CTA false positives as true negatives. When patients with Agatston score >1,000 were excluded, per-patient accuracy of FFRCT was 83% with a high specificity of 76%, similar to the overall NXT trial findings. CONCLUSIONS: FFRCT has high diagnostic performance compared with invasive FFR in the Japanese subset of patients in the NXT trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyoshi et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=57). Non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFRCT) vs. Standard stenosis quantification on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) was evaluated on Per-patient diagnostic accuracy compared with invasive FFR (p=<0.001). Non-invasive FFRCT achieved higher per-patient diagnostic accuracy than standard coronary CTA in Japanese patients with suspected CAD (74% vs. 47%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: