PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology2,130 citations

Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease

View Full Paper
MBMatthew J. BudoffDDDavid A. DoweJJJames G. Jollis

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row CCTA in detecting coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known CAD.
  • Prospective evaluation of 230 subjects with chest pain at 16 sites referred for invasive coronary angiography.
  • CCTA results evaluated by consensus of three independent blinded readers.
  • Stenosis assessed using quantitative coronary angiography.
  • CCTA demonstrated 95% sensitivity and 83% specificity for detecting >50% stenosis.
  • The negative predictive value was 99%, indicating its effectiveness as a noninvasive method.
  • Calcium scores >400 significantly reduced specificity.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiographically gated 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: CCTA is a promising method for detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery stenosis. To date, no prospective multicenter trial has evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row CCTA in populations with intermediate prevalence of CAD. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated subjects with chest pain at 16 sites who were clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). CCTAs were scored by consensus of 3 independent blinded readers. The ICAs were evaluated for coronary stenosis based on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). No subjects were excluded for baseline coronary artery calcium score or body mass index. RESULTS: A total of 230 subjects underwent both CCTA and ICA (59.1% male; mean age: 57 +/- 10 years). On a patient-based model, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values to detect > or =50% or > or =70% stenosis were 95%, 83%, 64%, and 99%, respectively, and 94%, 83%, 48%, 99%, respectively. No differences in sensitivity and specificity were noted for nonobese compared with obese subjects or for heart rates 65 beats/min, whereas calcium scores >400 reduced specificity significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective multicenter trial of chest pain patients without known CAD, 64-multidetector row CCTA possesses high diagnostic accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary stenosis at both thresholds of 50% and 70% stenosis. Importantly, the 99% negative predictive value at the patient and vessel level establishes CCTA as an effective noninvasive alternative to ICA to rule out obstructive coronary artery stenosis. (A Study of Computed Tomography CT for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Blockages in Typical or Atypical Chest Pain; NCT00348569).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Budoff et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0988067a6e43416796923chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coronary Arteries: Diagnostic Performance of 16- versus 64-Section Spiral CT Compared with Invasive Coronary Angiography—Meta-Analysis2007 · 241 citations
  2. 2OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY2007 · 732 citations
  3. 3A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association1975 · 3,264 citations
  4. 4Visual versus quantitative assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenoses: Can the angiographer's eye be reeducated?1993 · 26 citations
  5. 5ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging⁎⁎Developed in accordance with the principles and methodology outlined by ACCF: Patel MR, Spertus JA, Brindis RG, Hendel RC, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, Raskin IE. ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1606–13.2006 · 1,289 citations