Key result
CCTA detected >50% coronary artery stenosis with 99% sensitivity and 81% specificity compared to invasive angiography, and correctly triaged 86% of NSTEMI patients.
Why the study?
Does 64-detector CCTA accurately diagnose and triage patients presenting with NSTEMI compared to invasive coronary angiography?
Observational (n=400)
Does 64-detector CCTA accurately diagnose and triage patients presenting with NSTEMI compared to invasive coronary angiography?
While CCTA has high diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant stenosis in NSTEMI patients, its routine use as an additional test before invasive coronary angiography is not supported due to logistical and safety obstacles.
CCTA accuracy in NSTEMI does not support routine pre-angiography use; leaves open triage role pending randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: To test if cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be used in the triage of patients at high risk of coronary artery disease. DESIGN: The diagnostic value of 64-detector CCTA was evaluated in 400 patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference method. The relation between the severity of disease by CCTA and a combined endpoint of death, re-hospitalization due to new myocardial infarction, or symptom-driven coronary revascularization was assessed. RESULTS: CCTA detects significant (>50%) coronary artery diameter stenosis with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of 99%, 81%, 96% and 95%, respectively. CCTA was used to triage patients into guideline defined treatment groups of "no or medical treatment", "referral to percutaneous coronary intervention" or to "coronary artery bypass graft surgery" and was compared to the index ICA. CCTA correctly triaged patients in 86% of cases. During a median follow-up of 50 months, the presence of an occluded artery by CCTA was associated with adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: CCTA has high diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease and could, in theory, be used to triage high risk patients. As many obstacles remain, including logistical and safety issues, our study does not support the use of CCTA as an additional diagnostic test before ICA in an all-comer NSTEMI population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kühl et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (n=400). Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was evaluated on Detection of significant (>50%) coronary artery diameter stenosis and correct triage. CCTA detected >50% coronary artery stenosis with 99% sensitivity and 81% specificity compared to invasive angiography, and correctly triaged 86% of NSTEMI patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: