Why the study?
Do breath-hold velocity- and acceleration-sensitized segmented sequences improve image quality while maintaining similar signal loss compared to conventional gradient echo sequences in subjects undergoing cardiovascular MR?
Do breath-hold velocity- and acceleration-sensitized segmented sequences improve image quality while maintaining similar signal loss compared to conventional gradient echo sequences in subjects undergoing cardiovascular MR?
Breath-hold acceleration-sensitized MR sequences improve image quality while maintaining comparable signal loss to conventional sequences for assessing flow disturbances in valvular heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Breath-hold sequences may improve CMR image quality without changing signal loss; leaves open diagnostic utility in valvular disease.
PURPOSE: To develop a breath-hold segmented sequence which generates similar patterns of signal loss to a non-breath-hold, relatively long echo time, conventional gradient echo sequence for the qualitative assessment of valvular heart disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both velocity-sensitized and acceleration-sensitized segmented sequences were developed. The sensitivities were empirically adjusted to give similar degrees of signal loss to a conventional sequence. These sequences were compared with a conventional sequence in eight patients with flow disturbances and in four healthy subjects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the extent of signal loss observed when using the breath-hold velocity- and acceleration-sensitized sequences developed and the conventional sequence (1862 mm(2), 1831 mm(2), and 1782 mm(2), respectively; P = ns). However, the image quality obtained was significantly better with the breath-hold sequences (both P < 0.01). Furthermore, the image quality achieved with the acceleration-sensitized sequence was significantly better than that achieved with the velocity-sensitized sequence (P < 0.01) where artifacts from beat-to-beat variations in blood-flow velocities were a frequent problem. CONCLUSION: Signal loss in complex flow is best demonstrated using the breath-hold acceleration-sensitized sequence where the signal from both stationary and constant velocity material is rephased at the echo time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keegan et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: