The ability of natriuretic peptides to reduce ventricular myocyte function is blunted in T4-induced hypertrophic myocytes due to reduced stimulated particulate guanylyl cyclase activity.
Caution against extrapolating NP effects from normal to hypertrophic myocytes clinically; leaves open NP signaling defects for human studies.
We tested the hypothesis that the negative functional effects of natriuretic peptides would be blunted in thyroxine (T4)-induced hypertrophic cardiac myocytes. We also studied the causes of these changes. Ventricular myocytes were obtained from control (n=8) and T4 (0.5 mg/kg/16 days) treated rabbit hearts (n=7). Cell shortening parameters were studied with a video edge detector. We also determined particulate (pGC) and soluble (sGC) guanylyl cyclase activity and cyclic GMP levels. Myocyte function was examined at baseline and after brain natriuretic peptide (BNP 10(-7,-6) M) or C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP 10(-7,-6) M) or zaprinast (cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor 10(-6)M) followed by BNP or CNP. Baseline function was similar in control and T4 myocytes. BNP (5.7 +/- 0.2 to 4.3 +/- 0.1%) and CNP (5.7 +/- 0.4 to 4.2 +/- 0.2%) significantly reduced percent shortening in control myocytes. These reductions were not observed with T4 (BNP, 5.7 +/- 0.6 to 5.6 +/- 0.6; CNP, 5.6 +/- 0.4 to 5.5 +/- 0.5). BNP and CNP responded similarly after zaprinast. Baseline cyclic GMP was similar in control and T4, but BNP only increased cyclic GMP in controls. The activity of pGC was similar at baseline in control and T4, but the stimulated activity was significantly lower in T4 myocytes. Both basal and stimulated sGC activity were similar in control and hypertrophic myocytes. These results demonstrated that the ability of natriuretic peptides to reduce ventricular myocyte function was blunted in T4 hypertrophic myocytes. This blunted response was related to the reduced ability of natriuretic peptides to increase cyclic GMP levels due to a reduced stimulated particulate guanylyl cyclase activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: