Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The risk of receiving a PLT concentrate (PC) contaminated with bacteria may be 1000-fold greater than that of pathogenic viral transmission, yet surveillance for this risk is not generally practiced. A novel bacteria detection system (BDS) that overcomes the limitations of current systems is described. The BDS monitors percent oxygen (%O2) in air above aliquots of PCs that have been filtered to remove the confounding effect of respiring PLTs and residual WBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: One-day-old WBC-reduced whole-blood-derived PCs (WBPCs) were inoculated with bacteria at 100 to 500 CFU per mL. After 30 minutes, 2- to 3-mL aliquots were processed through a PLT-reducing filter into a sample pouch containing sodium polyanethol sulfonate and entrained air. After incubation at 35 degrees C for at least 24 hours, the %O2 was measured within the pouch. Noninoculated WBC-reduced WBPCs (n = 155), confirmed free of bacteria by routine culture, were tested in a like manner. Results from the latter group of WBC-reduced WBPCs were used to distinguish contaminated from noncontaminated units. RESULTS: After a 24-hour incubation at 35 degrees C, 195 (96.5%) of the 202 sample pouches obtained from inoculated units were detected by the BDS. After an additional 6 hours at room temperature, those that remained and were tested were found positive. None of the noninoculated controls produced a positive reading. CONCLUSION: The BDS is easy to use and provides good levels of sensitivity and specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortolano et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: