Why the study?
The relationship between adolescents with major depressive disorder, particularly those at high risk for suicide, and their hemodynamic response characteristics has not been elucidated.
Can fNIRS during a Stroop test combined with machine learning accurately classify suicide high-risk versus low-risk adolescents with MDD?
Can fNIRS during a Stroop test combined with machine learning accurately classify suicide high-risk versus low-risk adolescents with MDD?
fNIRS signals during a Stroop test may serve as a neurological biomarker to distinguish suicide high-risk from low-risk adolescents with MDD.
fNIRS may aid suicide-risk stratification in adolescent MDD; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger prospective studies.
Prefrontal cortex activation is attenuated during cognitive tasks in patients with suicidal ideation or major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the apparent relationship between patients with MDD, especially suicide high-risk (SHR) adolescents, and the characteristics of their hemodynamic responses has not yet been elucidated. To investigate this relationship, we recruited 30 patients with MDD aged 13−19. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data were collected for all patients during a Stroop test. Through a ten-time iterative leave-one-out cross-validation via 1000 iterative random search-based feature selections, we achieved a generalized classification accuracy of 70.3±5.0 % (from min. 63.3 % to max. 76.7 %). From the results of random search-based feature selection, Ch08oxy and Ch09deoxy were identified as the two most relevant fNIRS channels. This finding implies that these fNIRS channels can be used as neurological biomarkers to distinguish SHR adolescents with MDD from suicide low-risk (SLR) adolescents. In addition, we determined the oxy-Hb channels of the SHR group, except for Ch01oxy, Ch02oxy, Ch11oxy, and Ch14oxy, were hyperactivated compared to the SLR group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: