Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tetrathiafulvalene–tetracyanoquinodimethane (TTF·TCNQ) and related high conductive organic complexes were studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The N 1s peak shape of TTF·TCNQ evaporated film was found to change by X-ray irradiation; the high-binding energy shoulder of the N 1s peak increased its intensity with X-ray irradiation time and finally showed a new peak separated by about 1.5 eV from the main peak. TTF·TCNQ was found to be 1:1 both in the surface and in the bulk. The amounts of charge transfer in TTF·TCNQ and other TTF complexes as well as those in 5,6:11,12-bis(dithio)naphthacene(tetrathiotetracene, TTT) complexes were determined from the analysis of the S 2p peak shape. The amount of charge transfer is 0.56±0.05 in TTF·TCNQ and 0.55±0.05 in TTF·TNAP (tetracyanonaphthoquinodimethane). The molecular ratio of (donor)+ in donor molecules is 0.71±0.05 in TTF·Br0.7, 0.52±0.05 in TTF·I0.7, 0.65±0.05 in (TTF)3(BF4)2, 0.49±0.05 in (TTT)2I3, and 0.93±0.05 in (TTT)(TCNQ)2, which correspond respectively to 100, 73, 100, 100, and 100% charge transfer between donors and acceptors. The N 1s peak shape of TTF·TCNQ is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikemoto et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: