Fibrinolytic therapy is crucial for treating acute ischemic syndromes but requires stringent patient selection due to severe bleeding risks.
Requires stringent selection to balance benefits against bleeding in acute ischemic syndromes; leaves open optimization of criteria with modern adjuncts.
One of the major breakthroughs in the treatment of cardiovascular disease has been the introduction of fibrinolytic therapy. Better knowledge of the pathogenesis of acute ischemic syndromes has identified acute thrombosis as the triggering event in most cases. Thrombosis of large and small arteries may have catastrophic consequences as sudden death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism and acute limb necrosis. Fibrinolytic therapy is aimed at early restoration of occluded blood vessels thereby improving symptoms and organ recovery, reducing infarct size and subsequently improving quantity and quality of life. However, fibrinolytic drugs have severe, sometimes fatal side-effects. They mainly consist of bleeding, sometimes fatal cerebral bleeding. Therefore, stringent patient selection is mandatory: age, time to treatment, relative and absolute contraindications and comitant medication are of utmost importance for safe and efficacious fibrinolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoicket et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: