Key result
A sequential combination of tPA and proUK opened the responsible coronary vessel in 82% of AMI patients compared to 45% with tPA monotherapy in historical trials.
Why the study?
Current fibrinolysis using tPA monotherapy is not sufficiently safe to administer without pre-testing nor sufficiently effective, despite being the only therapy able to fulfill rapid initiation criteria.
Does a sequential combination of plasminogen activators improve efficacy and safety compared to tPA monotherapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke?
Does a sequential combination of plasminogen activators improve efficacy and safety compared to tPA monotherapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke?
Absolute Event Rate: 82% vs 45%
The authors argue that current tPA monotherapy for AMI and stroke is insufficiently safe and effective, proposing a sequential combination of plasminogen activators as a necessary improvement.
May improve AMI reperfusion rates; hypothesis-generating, requiring RCTs before any practice consideration in AMI or stroke.
A clot that obstructs blood flow triggers the onset of most heart attacks and 85% of strokes, the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Reestablishing blood flow rapidly limits damage to the heart or brain, saves lives, and can restore well-being. Since “time is heart or brain,” treatment must be initiated rapidly, which means by a readily available method. Fibrinolysis is the only therapy able to fulfill these criteria but the current method using tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) monotherapy is not sufficiently safe to be administered without pre-testing nor is it sufficiently effective to be very useful. Although anticoagulants have evolved, especially in recent years, the same thrombolytic has been used since 1987, when tPA monotherapy was approved for the treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and subsequently also for ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victor Gurewich (2019) conducted a review in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) (n=101). Sequential combination of tPA and proUK vs. tPA monotherapy (historical comparison to GUSTO trial) was evaluated on Coronary vessel opening. A sequential combination of tPA and proUK opened the responsible coronary vessel in 82% of AMI patients compared to 45% with tPA monotherapy in historical trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: