Why the study?
Does a multiple polynomial regression approach improve the accuracy of pharmacogenomic algorithms for warfarin dosing compared to multiple linear regression?
Does a multiple polynomial regression approach improve the accuracy of pharmacogenomic algorithms for warfarin dosing compared to multiple linear regression?
Multiple polynomial regression may provide more accurate and safe warfarin dose predictions than multiple linear regression in pharmacogenomic algorithms.
MPR may refine warfarin dose predictions over MLR; leaves open outcome benefits pending prospective validation.
AIM: To ascertain whether multiple polynomial regression (MPR) has any advantage over multiple linear regression (MLR) in developing pharmacogenomic algorithms. MATERIALS & METHODS: Two pharmacogenomic algorithms were developed based on MPR and MLR models from a warfarin pharmacogenomic data set (derivation cohort [n = 125] and validation cohort [n = 115]). RESULTS: The MPR model showed better correlation with therapeutic dose (r = 0.62 vs 0.52); better diagnostic utility in distinguishing the warfarin-sensitive and warfarin-resistant patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves: 0.89 vs 0.81); and lower rate of underestimation (13.9 vs 20%) compared with the MLR model. Rate of overestimation was higher in the MPR than the MLR (10 vs 6.7%) model. CONCLUSION: The MPR approach has advantages over the MLR approach in predicting accurate and safe dose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavani et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: