Why the study?
Studies have evaluated oral Flecainide 400 mg for provocative testing in Brugada syndrome, but the clinical utility of lower dose Flecainide (300 mg) had never been documented.
Does low dose oral flecainide (300 mg) unmask the Brugada electrocardiographic pattern in patients suspected of Brugada syndrome?
Does low dose oral flecainide (300 mg) unmask the Brugada electrocardiographic pattern in patients suspected of Brugada syndrome?
Low dose oral flecainide (300 mg) may be an effective and safe alternative for provocative testing to unmask Brugada syndrome.
Hypothesis-generating for low-dose flecainide in Brugada diagnosis; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a genetic disease characterized by coved ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads that predispose to life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The electrocardiographic signature is dynamic and often concealed but can be unmasked by potent sodium channel blockers such as Flecainide. Some studies have evaluated the effectivity of oral Flecainide 400 mg for provocative testing, but clinical utility of lower dose Flecainide (300 mg) has never been documented. Case summary: These two cases illustrate the effectiveness of low dose oral Flecainide to unmask Brugada electrocardiographic pattern. In our patients, diagnostic type 1 electrocardiography started to develop 30 min after drug administration and reached maximal positivity at 3.5-4.5 h. No atrioventricular block or ventricular arrhythmia was observed during the procedures. Discussion: A potent sodium channel blocker facilitates marked reduction of the right ventricle epicardial action potential, which creates a transmural voltage dispersion and manifests as an ST elevation in the right precordial leads. Time to positivity was comparably rapid, and time to maximal ST-elevation appeared close to peak plasma level of Flecainide (ranging from 1 to 6 h). Although asymptomatic patients have a low rate of adverse cardiac events, it is crucial to inform patients to avoid various modulators and precipitating factors that could trigger malignant arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amir et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: