Key result
The flecainide test was 100% reproducible in Brugada syndrome but induced major ventricular arrhythmias in 18% of patients, with higher risk in those with SCN5A mutations (43% vs 7%, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Is the flecainide test reproducible and safe for diagnosing Brugada syndrome?
Population
22 patients with Brugada syndrome and 25 control patients without structural heart disease.
Comparison
Flecainide test, with a second test performed… vs 25 control patients without structural heart…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
up to 2 months
Authors
Loading...
Requires continuous ECG monitoring during flecainide challenge; leaves open genotype-guided protocols to reduce arrhythmia risk.
Observational (n=47)
Is the flecainide test reproducible and safe for diagnosing Brugada syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 18% vs 0%
While the flecainide test is highly reproducible for diagnosing Brugada syndrome, it carries a significant risk of inducing major ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in patients with SCN5A mutations, necessitating strict medical supervision.
Gasparini et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Brugada syndrome (n=47). Flecainide test vs. Control patients without structural heart disease was evaluated on Major ventricular arrhythmias after flecainide infusion. The flecainide test was 100% reproducible in Brugada syndrome but induced major ventricular arrhythmias in 18% of patients, with higher risk in those with SCN5A mutations (43% vs 7%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: