Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subsurface approaches to soil CO 2 monitoring are becoming increasingly important for process studies in terrestrial carbon research. When used in conjunction with a diffusion model to determine CO 2 production, subsurface methods require good estimates of effective soil gas diffusivity (D e ). Outlined here is a novel membrane probe and continuous flow system for in situ soil gas diffusivity measurements. Laboratory tests confirm performance across the range of CO 2 diffusivities found in natural soils. Field tests were performed across a range of soil moisture contents by artificially hydrating eight soils over a period of three to seven days. These soils were representative of a range of textural classes in eastern Nova Scotia, Canada. The absolute values of diffusivity, and also the rate at which diffusivity decreased with increasing soil moisture content were typically quite different from model predictions. When applied to subsurface CO 2 monitoring at two sites, the site‐specific diffusivity measurements greatly improved the accuracy of CO 2 production estimates. We observed a consistent and close correspondence between calculated profile CO 2 production and (independently measured) soil CO 2 surface flux. The subsurface CO 2 production estimates acquired using in situ gas diffusivity measurements allows detailed vertical profile resolution to be constructed over time. The majority of CO 2 was generated at shallow depths, but periodic contributions from deeper depths were important, particularly towards the end of the growing season.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Risk et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: