Why the study?
Does the GPTFX framework improve the classification and explanation of mental health disorders compared to traditional algorithms?
Does the GPTFX framework improve the classification and explanation of mental health disorders compared to traditional algorithms?
The GPTFX framework demonstrates high accuracy and explanation quality for mental health detection, suggesting potential utility for real-time monitoring in AI-IoMT devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid exploratory mental health screening; leaves open prospective clinical validation before any practice change.
This paper introduces a novel approach GPTFX, an AI-based mental detection with GPT frameworks. This approach leverages GPT embeddings and the fine-tuning of GPT-3. This approach exhibits superior performance in both classifying mental health disorders and generating explanations with accuracy of around 87% in classification and Rouge-L of around 0.75. We utilized GPT embeddings with machine learning models for the classification of mental health disorders. Additionally, GPT-3 was fine-tuned for generating explanations related to the predictions made by these machine learning models. Notably, the proposed algorithm proves well-suited for real-time monitoring of mental health by deploying in AI-IoMT devices, as it has demonstrated greater reliability when compared to traditional algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazumdar et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: