Why the study?
Does the addition of ultraportable echocardiography to standard screening improve the detection of structural abnormalities in adolescents at risk for sudden cardiac death?
Does the addition of ultraportable echocardiography to standard screening improve the detection of structural abnormalities in adolescents at risk for sudden cardiac death?
Ultraportable echocardiography is feasible in adolescent screening programs and can identify structural abnormalities missed by standard ECG and physical exams.
May augment structural abnormality detection in adolescent SCD screening; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials before adoption.
BACKGROUND: Over a 12-month period, adolescent heart-screening programs were performed for identifying at-risk adolescents for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in our community. Novel to our study, all adolescents received an abbreviated, ultraportable echocardiography (UPE). In this report, we describe the use of UPE in this screening program. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-two adolescents underwent cardiac screening with medical history questionnaire, physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), and an abbreviated transthoracic echocardiographic examination. There were 11 abnormalities identified with uncertain/varying clinical risk significance. In this population, 75 adolescents had a murmur or high ECG voltage, of which only three had subsequent structural abnormalities on echocardiography that may pose risk. Conversely, UPE discovered four adolescents who had a cardiovascular structural abnormality that was not signaled by the 12-lead ECG, medical history questionnaire, and/or physical examination. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of ultraportable, handheld echocardiography is feasible in large-scale adolescent cardiovascular screening programs. UPE appears to be useful for finding additional structural abnormalities and for risk-stratifying abnormalities of uncertain potential of adolescents' sudden death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanhecke et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: