Key result
Portable echocardiography delivers ~96% sensitivity for diagnosing left ventricular systolic dysfunction versus traditional machines.
Why the study?
Does portable echocardiography accurately detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction and other cardiac abnormalities compared to traditional echocardiography in a community screening population?
Population
562 consecutive subjects attending a community-based heart failure screening programme
Comparison
Portable echocardiography with 'eyeball'… vs Traditional echocardiography machines with…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support community LVSD screening; leaves open whether adoption improves outcomes in prospective trials.
Cross-Sectional (n=562)
Does portable echocardiography accurately detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction and other cardiac abnormalities compared to traditional echocardiography in a community screening population?
Portable echocardiography is highly accurate and reproducible for detecting left ventricular systolic dysfunction, making it a viable tool for community-based heart failure screening.
Galasko et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac abnormalities (n=562). Portable echocardiography vs. Traditional echocardiography was evaluated on Diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Portable echocardiography demonstrated 96% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 99.6% negative predictive value for diagnosing left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to traditional machines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: