Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mark‐recapture studies using fluorochrome dyes are a valuable approach for validating the age determination of fish, yet the optimal chemical marker and its dosage for adult European flounder ( Platichthys flesus Linnaeus, 1758) remain unclear. We assessed the effectiveness of tetracycline hydrochloride and calcein at different concentrations for marking otoliths and the survival rates. A total of 117 adult European flounder were injected intraperitoneally either with one of the chemical markers or with a saline solution as a control. They were held in stationary net pens in the western Baltic Sea over a 69‐day period. Fish were monitored for survival, growth, and body condition, and otoliths were examined for fluorescence mark quality. Survival was highest in the tetracycline groups: 90% at 25 and 50 mg/kg, and 82% at 100 mg/kg, whereas calcein treatments were associated with intermediate survival: 55% at 0.5 mg/kg and 50% at 5 mg/kg. A total of 76% of otoliths in the tetracycline hydrochloride‐treated fish showed usable fluorescence marks (good: 12%, poor: 64%), while marks of calcein‐treated fish were only observed in 10% of the otoliths. The differences in survival outcome between the three tetracycline dosages were not significant, supporting the use of the lowest tested tetracycline dose (25 mg/kg) for effective marking. These results indicate that tetracycline hydrochloride is a suitable and well‐tolerated chemical marker for adult European flounder, whereas calcein was unsuitable due to the recorded mortality and low marking success. The findings provide a methodological basis for mark‐recapture studies of European flounder in the Baltic Sea and may inform similar applications in other areas and in related flatfish species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: