Why the study?
Does edoxaban successfully treat venous thromboembolism recurrence in a 66-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer after tumor shrinkage?
Does edoxaban successfully treat venous thromboembolism recurrence in a 66-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer after tumor shrinkage?
Controlling tumor size and activity may enable the successful use of edoxaban as maintenance therapy for VTE in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tumor control may enable transition from UFH to oral anticoagulants in refractory cancer-associated VTE; leaves open prospective confirmation before practice change.
This report describes the case of a 66-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was initially used to control VTE before chemotherapy. However, switching UFH to warfarin or edoxaban, a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), failed. Chemotherapy was then administered to control the tumor which was thought to have been the main cause of VTE, which had been treated by UFH. After tumor shrinkage was achieved by chemotherapy, we were able to successfully switch from UFH to edoxaban. Controlling the tumor size and activity enabled the use of edoxaban as maintenance therapy for VTE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shoji et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: