Key result
Edoxaban achieves near-total regression of persistent brachiocephalic deep vein thrombosis at 3 months.
Why the study?
Upper limb deep vein thrombosis is poorly studied with limited data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in noncatheter-related cases in cancer patients.
Does edoxaban improve brachiocephalic deep vein thrombosis in a patient with primitive mediastinal seminoma refractory to enoxaparin?
Case Report (n=1)
Does edoxaban improve brachiocephalic deep vein thrombosis in a patient with primitive mediastinal seminoma refractory to enoxaparin?
Edoxaban was effective and safe in treating noncatheter-related upper limb deep vein thrombosis in a patient with active cancer after failure of low molecular weight heparin.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report suggests DOAC feasibility for upper limb cancer thrombosis; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
RATIONALE: Venous thromboembolism is a feared frequent complication of cancer with a 2-way relationship. Low molecular weight heparin is the mainstay of treatment. The use of direct oral anticoagulants is supported by established evidence for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis also in active cancer and they are prioritized over low molecular weight heparin for cancer-associated thrombosis according to current guidelines. However, upper limb deep vein thrombosis is poorly studied with scant data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in noncatheter-related deep vein thrombosis. We report the case of a patient with noncatheter-related deep vein thrombosis and a rare tumor site effectively and safely treated with a direct oral anticoagulant, edoxaban, after lack of efficacy with low molecular weight heparin. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 35-year-old man with primitive mediastinal seminoma presented at our Cardio-Oncology Unit for prechemotherapy assessment. DIAGNOSIS: Persistent brachiocephalic deep vein thrombosis, despite full-dose enoxaparin, was detected at ultrasonography. INTERVENTION: We decided to switch the anticoagulant treatment from enoxaparin to edoxaban. OUTCOME: The 3-month ultrasonography showed almost total regression of the deep vein thrombosis without any adverse effects and a good patient compliance. LESSONS: We conducted a literature review on upper limb deep vein thrombosis, since its management is challenging due to inconsistency of evidence. This report highlights the benefits of direct oral anticoagulants compared to low molecular weight heparins in cancer-associated thrombosis therapy in terms of efficacy, safety and ease of use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fioretti et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Brachiocephalic deep vein thrombosis in primitive mediastinal seminoma (n=1). Edoxaban vs. Enoxaparin was evaluated on Regression of deep vein thrombosis. Edoxaban treatment resulted in almost total regression of persistent brachiocephalic deep vein thrombosis at 3 months in a patient with primitive mediastinal seminoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: