Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar or higher efficacy compared to dalteparin for cancer-related VTE, with varying risks of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding.
Why the study?
Although low molecular weight heparin has been the gold standard for cancer-related venous thromboembolism, low compliance has prompted evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improve efficacy and safety compared to low molecular weight heparin or vitamin K antagonists in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism?
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improve efficacy and safety compared to low molecular weight heparin or vitamin K antagonists in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DOACs are an effective and guideline-recommended alternative to LMWH for the treatment of cancer-related VTE, though careful consideration of bleeding risks is required.
This article is a review of epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. In accordance with actual guidelines, the duration of anticoagulant therapy of cancer-related venous thrombosis should be at least 6 months. The use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is associated with an increased risk of VTE recurrence and bleeding, so low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), in particular dalteparin, has been the "gold standard" until recently. Compared to VKA, prolonged use of LMWH can reduce the incidence of VTE recurrence without affecting the risk of bleeding or death. The main disadvantage of LMWH is low compliance, leading to premature discontinuation of treatment or switching to alternative anticoagulants. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have changed the situation. Compared to VKA, they demonstrated higher efficacy with a similar (or improved for individual DOACs) safety in patients with cancer-related VTE. Recently, the results of studies comparing the use of DOACs with dalteparin in cancer patients have been published: SELECT-D (rivaroxaban), HOKUSAI-VTE Cancer (edoxaban), ADAM VTE (apixaban), CARAVAGGIO (apixaban). Rivaroxaban showed higher efficacy than dalteparin with a similar risk of major bleeding, but an increased risk of clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Edoxaban had the same efficacy as dalteparin but increased risk of major but not CRNM bleeding. Apixaban showed similar efficacy and safety as dalteparin in the CARAVAGGIO study, but did not provide higher safety in the ADAM VTE study. It was noted that gastrointestinal and urogenital bleeding dominated in the structure of hemorrhagic complications of DOACs. The results of published trials are reflected in the current guidelines of the specialized societies. DOACs (particularly, rivaroxaban and edoxaban) are recommended for the VTE treatment in cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lobastov et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cancer-related venous thromboembolism (VTE). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) / Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar or higher efficacy compared to dalteparin for cancer-related VTE, with varying risks of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: