Why the study?
Does PFO morphology affect the echocardiographic closure rate after transcatheter PFO closure in patients with paradoxical embolism?
Does PFO morphology affect the echocardiographic closure rate after transcatheter PFO closure in patients with paradoxical embolism?
Transcatheter PFO closure rates depend more on the underlying PFO morphology (simple vs. complex) than on the specific occluder size or type.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Complex PFO morphology was associated with lower closure rates across devices; leaves open whether morphology-specific selection improves outcomes.
AIMS: Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in cryptogenic cerebrovascular events is an alternative to medical therapy. The interpretation of residual shunts after implantation of different devices for PFO with different morphologies is controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transcatheter PFO closure was performed in 123 patients with a history of ≥1 paradoxical embolism using three different devices: Amplatzer (n = 46), Figulla Occlutech (n = 41), and Atriasept Cardia (n = 36). Fifty-six patients presented with simple PFO and 67 patients had complex morphologies. All patients were studied with contrast enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before interventional procedure and thereafter at 1 and 6 months and every 6-12 months in case of incomplete closure. Definite closure was confirmed in at least two consecutive TEE studies. Various PFO morphologies were identified by TEE before device implantation. The device size to PFO diameter ratio was significantly increased in patients with complex PFO compared with those patients with a simple PFO morphology (P < 0.05). The difference between the closure rate of S-PFO and C-PFO concerning each device type was significant (Amplatzer P = 0.0027, Figulla P = 0.0043, and Atriasept P < 0.01). The mean follow-up period was 3.4 years (median 2.7 years) with a cerebrovascular re-event rate of 2.4% per year. In three patients, thrombi were detected in the 6-month TEE controls and resolved after medical therapy. In three other patients, the implantation of an adjunctive device was necessary for residual shunt. CONCLUSION: In our series of patients, the closure rate was dependent on PFO morphology more than occluder size and type. An adjunctive device was implanted in selected cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vitarelli et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: