Why the study?
Although long-term prognosis is important for newly diagnosed patients with slow channel syndrome, extensive follow-up studies are rare.
A 40-year follow-up of two patients with slow channel syndrome reveals a mildly progressive, fluctuating disease course responsive to specific pharmacological treatments.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: The slow channel syndrome is a rare hereditary disorder caused by a dominant gain-of-function variant in one of the subunits of the acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction. Patients typically experience axial, limb and particularly extensor finger muscle weakness. OBJECTIVE: Age at diagnosis is variable and although the long-term prognosis is important for newly diagnosed patients, extensive follow-up studies are rare. We aim to provide answers and perspective for this patient group by presenting an elaborate description of the lifetime follow-up of two slow channel syndrome patients. METHODS: We describe 40 years follow-up in two, genetically confirmed cases (CHRNA1; c.866G > T p.(Ser289Ile)(legacy Ser269Ile) and CHRNE; c.721C > T p.(Leu241Phe)(legacy Leu221Phe) variants). RESULTS: We find that the disease course has a fluctuating pattern and is only mildly progressive. However, hormonal imbalances, (psychological) stress or excessive hot or cold environments are often aggravating factors. Quinidine and fluoxetine are helpful, but ephedrine and salbutamol may also improve symptoms. CONCLUSION: Slow channel syndrome is mildly progressive with a fluctuating pattern. The observations reported here provide a lifespan perspective and answers to the most pressing questions about prognosis and treatment options for newly diagnosed patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Informs prognosis counseling in slow-channel syndrome; leaves open validation in larger prospective cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boon et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: