Why the study?
Does a semi-automatic boundary detection system improve the agreement of regional left ventricular function reporting by less experienced echocardiographers compared to expert readers?
Does a semi-automatic boundary detection system improve the agreement of regional left ventricular function reporting by less experienced echocardiographers compared to expert readers?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Semi-automatic boundary detection improves the assessment of regional left ventricular function for novice echocardiographers and may serve as a useful training tool.
AIMS: The reporting of regional left ventricular function is based on subjective assessment of endocardial motion and thickening and has a significant learning curve. We hypothesized that the use of an semi-automatic boundary detection system generating images with superimposed moving endocardial borders and a fixed end-diastolic reference border could improve the reporting of regional function. METHODS: We obtained 58 resting contrast images of 15 patients and using a new boundary detection system (Quamus), generated images with superimposed endocardial borders. The contrast images, images with additional Quamus borders and Quamus borders alone were assessed by two level 1 and two level 2 echocardiographers. They scored regional function and results were compared to two level 3 experienced stress echocardiography readers. RESULTS: The addition of borders improved the agreement of level 1 echocardiographers (weighted Kappa increased from 0.55 to 0.64) but did not change for level 2 echocardiographers (0.63 to 0.64) and has the potential to be a useful training tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timperley et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: