Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Off-the-shelf consumer digital cameras are convenient and user-friendly. However, the use of these cameras in remote sensing is limited because convenient methods for concurrently determining visible and near-infrared (NIR) radiation using these cameras have not been developed. Two Nikon Coolpix 4300 digital cameras were evaluated in tandem to determine the effectiveness of a cross-camera calibration procedure that would allow concurrent use of an unmodified digital camera and a NIR-sensitive digital camera without preset shutter speeds or aperture settings. The NIR-sensitive camera was modified to detect NIR radiation by replacing the internal hot mirror with a Hoya RM72 filter. Each camera was calibrated at five exposure levels using a Gretag-Macbeth ColorCheckerTM reflectance panel, and raw camera brightness values were converted to relative reflectance by exposure compensation equations. The method was tested on a series of 26 diffuse reflectance targets, which also yielded the same exposure compensation relationships. The relationship between camera channel brightness and target reflectance was nonlinear within each exposure, but sensitivity was linear between exposures. The procedure was tested on 36 cotton plots (Gossypium hirsutum) in an irrigation study in 2006. Images obtained on eight dates during the season were corrected for exposure and converted to relative reflectance values. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values from the plots were then compared with ground-based spectrometer measurements of NDVI. Corrected camera-based NDVI values were closely correlated with the spectrometer NDVI values (r2 = 0.72), suggesting that the camera system can more consistently estimate crop reflectance characteristics if exposure compensation is applied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ritchie et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: