Why the study?
Does direct sheathless implantation of CS-LV pacing leads improve procedural efficiency without compromising pacing parameters compared to sheath-assisted implantation?
Does direct sheathless implantation of CS-LV pacing leads improve procedural efficiency without compromising pacing parameters compared to sheath-assisted implantation?
Direct sheathless placement of CS-LV pacing leads is feasible in a majority of cases and may reduce procedure time and complexity without compromising pacing parameters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sheathless CS-LV lead implantation was feasible without compromising parameters in most cases; hypothesis-generating for efficiency gains pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Implantation of CS-LV pacing leads is usually accomplished through specialized sheaths with additional use of contrast venography and other steps. Direct implantation at a target pacing site could provide a simplified procedure with appropriate leads. METHODS: A progressive CS-LV lead implant protocol was used, with initial attempts made to place the lead directly using only fluoroscopy and lead stylet or wire manipulation. Coronary sinus (CS) sheaths were only used later if direct lead placement failed. RESULTS: There were 105 attempted implants with 96% (101/105) success. Leads were implanted sheathlessly in 69% (70/101) cases. Pacing parameters and final lead position did not differ significantly between implants that did or did not require sheaths for implants. Three peri-procedural complications occurred in implants where sheaths were used. In 33% (33/101) of implants, the leads were placed without the use of sheaths or contrast venography in 20 minutes or less. CONCLUSIONS: Direct placement of the CS-LV pacing lead without sheaths can be accomplished successfully in a majority of implants and in < or =20 minutes in a third, without inferior pacing parameters. This may provide for shorter or less technically difficult or expensive procedures with low risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffmeister et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: