Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVViewpointNEXTWhy Is Ruthenium an Efficient Catalyst for the Aqueous-Phase Hydrogenation of Biosourced Carbonyl Compounds?Carine Michel*† and Pierre Gallezot*‡View Author Information† Laboratoire de Chimie UMR5182, University of Lyon, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 allée d'Italie, F-69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France‡ Institut de Recherches sur la Catalyse et l'Environnement (IRCELYON), University of Lyon, CNRS, 2 Avenue Albert Einstein, F-69626 Villeurbanne Cedex, France*E-mail: [email protected]*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 7, 4130–4132Publication Date (Web):May 29, 2015Publication History Received4 April 2015Published online9 June 2015Published inissue 2 July 2015https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.5b00707https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b00707editorialACS PublicationsCopyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views11540Altmetric-Citations158LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstract
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michel et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: