Why the study?
What are the rate-dependent electrophysiologic effects of nifekalant, amiodarone, and ibutilide on the atrium in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
What are the rate-dependent electrophysiologic effects of nifekalant, amiodarone, and ibutilide on the atrium in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Class III antiarrhythmic drugs exhibit distinct rate-dependent electrophysiologic effects on the remodeled atrium in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice in persistent AF; extends mechanistic understanding of distinct class III effects on remodeled atrium.
Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is characterized by electrical remodeling, ie, marked decreases in the atrial effective refractory period (ERP), ERP rate adaptation, and atrial conduction velocity. Little information is available on the effects of class III antiarrhythmic drugs on the remodeled atrium. We studied the effects of the class III antiarrhythmic drugs nifekalant, ibutilide, and amiodarone on rate-dependent changes in atrial action potential duration in patients with persistent AF. Right atrial (RA) monophasic action potential duration (MAPD) and intra-atrial conduction time (IACT) were measured at pacing cycle lengths (CLs) of 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 350, 300, and 250 ms before and after administration of nifekalant (0.4 mg/kg + 0.3 mg/kg/hr, iv), amiodarone (5 mg/kg, iv), or ibutilide (0.01 mg/kg, iv) in 31 patients after successful internal cardioversion of chronic AF of > 2 months duration. Nifekalant and ibutilide significantly increased RA MAPD and the ERP at each CL in a reverse rate-dependent manner. Amiodarone did not affect RA MAPD. Nifekalant did not affect IACT, whereas amiodarone increased IACT at each CL in a rate-dependent manner, and ibutilide increased IACT at CLs ≤ 350 ms. The atrial electrophysiologic effects of the class III antiarrhythmic drugs nifekalant, amiodarone, and ibutilide differ, depending on the degree of electrical and structural remodeling and the effects of the drugs on the depolarizing and repolarizing currents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonoda et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: