Why the study?
Does ibutilide fumarate improve arrhythmia termination in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter?
Does ibutilide fumarate improve arrhythmia termination in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter?
Ibutilide is an effective class III antiarrhythmic agent for the rapid termination of atrial fibrillation and flutter, though it carries a 1.7% risk of sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ibutilide may aid acute AF/AFL termination; leaves open comparative efficacy and safety versus modern agents in prospective trials.
Ibutilide fumarate (Corver™, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) is a novel class III methanesulfonamide antiarrhythmic agent clinically indicated for the rapid termination of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. This agent prolongs atrial and ventricular refractoriness and action potential duration. Ibutilide's mechanism of action is controversial, but may include potentiation of a slow inward Na+ current and inhibition of an outward K+ current (Ikr). Activation of an outward K+ current at high concentrations has also been reported. Ibutilide has no significant effects on cardiovascular autonomic function, myocardial contractility or systemic haemodynamics and has minimal effects on myocardial conduction velocity except at high concentrations. In large, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials, ibutilide produces arrhythmia termination in 29 - 31% of patients with atrial fibrillation and 36 - 63% of patients with atrial flutter. Conversion appears more likely for arrhythmias of shorter duration. Preliminary data suggest that ibutilide may prevent inducible ventricular tachycardia in 44% of patients, and, in animal models, ibutilide appears to reduce the energy requirements for ventricular defibrillation. In clinical studies, ibutilide is associated with sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in 1.7% of patients. Heart block (1.5%), hypotension (2.0%), and bradycardia (1.2%) are uncommon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wood et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: