Why the study?
Mutations in calmodulin are associated with long QT syndrome, but the molecular mechanisms causing irregular heartbeats remain not fully understood.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The LQTS-associated CaM mutation E140G severely impacts CaM structure and its regulation of CaMKIIδ and Cav1.2, providing insight into molecular mechanisms of CaM-mediated arrhythmias.
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a human inherited heart condition that can cause life-threatening arrhythmia including sudden cardiac death. Mutations in the ubiquitous Ca 2+ -sensing protein calmodulin (CaM) are associated with LQTS, but the molecular mechanism by which these mutations lead to irregular heartbeats is not fully understood. Here, we use a multidisciplinary approach including protein biophysics, structural biology, confocal imaging, and patch-clamp electrophysiology to determine the effect of the disease-associated CaM mutation E140G on CaM structure and function. We present novel data showing that mutant-regulated CaMKIIδ kinase activity is impaired with a significant reduction in enzyme autophosphorylation rate. We report the first high-resolution crystal structure of a LQTS-associated CaM variant in complex with the CaMKIIδ peptide, which shows significant structural differences, compared to the WT complex. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the E140G mutation significantly disrupted Ca v 1.2 Ca 2+ /CaM-dependent inactivation, while cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) activity remained unaffected. In addition, we show that the LQTS-associated mutation alters CaM's Ca 2+ -binding characteristics, secondary structure content, and interaction with key partners involved in excitation-contraction coupling (CaMKIIδ, Ca v 1.2, RyR2). In conclusion, LQTS-associated CaM mutation E140G severely impacts the structure-function relationship of CaM and its regulation of CaMKIIδ and Ca v 1.2. This provides a crucial insight into the molecular factors contributing to CaM-mediated arrhythmias with a central role for CaMKIIδ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prakash et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: