Why the study?
Are home blood pressure-measuring devices accurate and consistent compared to established standards?
Are home blood pressure-measuring devices accurate and consistent compared to established standards?
Nearly half of the tested home blood pressure devices failed accuracy standards, highlighting the need for careful device selection and patient training.
Clinicians should verify device validation before recommending home BP monitoring; leaves open the need for improved regulatory standards.
Self monitoring of blood pressure by hypertensive patients has been shown to be of value and is increasingly popular. However, the accuracy and ease of use of at least some of the equipment for home use is questionable. We tested 23 pairs of home blood pressure devices, using static methods, trained observers with volunteer subjects and hypertensive patients. Eleven (48%) of the 23 pairs of devices tested were found inconsistent with their duplicate and failed the standards for automated devices of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Several of the devices, all sold for home use by lay people, contained no instructions whatsoever and even patients using those machines with instructions required further training in blood pressure measurement. While home blood pressure monitoring is useful in certain circumstances, care must be taken in the choice of device, and training is required for all devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evans et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: