Why the study?
Does an adaptive least mean-squares (LMS) algorithm improve F-wave isolation from the electrocardiogram in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to average QRST subtraction?
Does an adaptive least mean-squares (LMS) algorithm improve F-wave isolation from the electrocardiogram in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to average QRST subtraction?
The LMS algorithm provides superior isolation of the electrocardiogram F-wave from the ventricular component in AF patients compared to standard average QRST subtraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve AF F-wave analysis; leaves open clinical impact or outcome benefits.
The electrocardiogram F-wave arising from atrial electrical activity is an important global measure for assessment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, successful F-wave extraction from the ventricular waveform can be problematic. Herein, a new F-wave isolation technique is introduced. For analysis, electrocardiogram lead I (termed unfiltered or UNF-signals) was retrospectively analyzed (39 AF patients, 8.4-s recordings, 8192 sample points, 96 recordings in total). To measure the efficacy of isolation techniques, a synthetic F-wave (7.29 Hz) and an interference were added to each electrocardiogram signal. In the resulting composite signals, the average electrocardiogram QRST complex template was subtracted from each actual QRST (AVG-isolation). The QRST template was also adjusted using a new adaptive least mean-squares (LMS) algorithm, and subtracted from each actual QRST (termed LMS-isolation). Four spectral parameters were measured to assess isolated F-wave quality: the dominant amplitude (DA), dominant frequency (DF) and mean/standard deviation in spectral profile (MP/SP). Significant parameter differences between UNF/LMS and between AVG/LMS were determined. The electrocardiogram F-wave spectral parameters were significantly improved by incorporating LMS-isolation as compared to no isolation (p < 0.001). The F-wave spectral parameters were also significantly improved using LMS-isolation as compared with AVG-isolation (DA/MP/SP: p < 0.001; DF: p < 0.05). The DF was correctly identified as 7.29 ± 0.10 Hz using ensemble spectral analysis with the following percentages (UNF: 24.0%, AVG: 69.8%, LMS: 80.2%), and Fourier spectral analysis with the following percentages (UNF: 15.6%, AVG: 60.4%, LMS: 75.0%). The LMS algorithm is helpful to isolate the electrocardiogram F-wave from the ventricular component as measured by spectral analysis, when compared to the use of an average QRST subtraction template.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciaccio et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: