Mixed methods study demonstrates the impact of inter-clan politics on border security in Mandera County, suggesting urgent governance reforms.
Purpose of the Study: This study examined the influence of inter-clan politics on border security along the Kenya–Somalia border, focusing on Mandera County. It sought to determine how clan-based political competition, cross-border clan alliances, political mobilisation, and disputes over representation contribute to insecurity and undermine effective border security management and regional stability. Methodology: The study adopted a mixed methods approach using a comparative descriptive research design. Data were collected from 95 respondents selected through stratified random sampling from a target population of 2,000. Questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis were used. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using SPSS and thematic analysis. Findings: The findings established that inter-clan politics significantly influences border security along the Kenya–Somalia border. Respondents strongly agreed that clan-based political competition escalates violent conflicts (M = 4.30), clan alliances weaken security cooperation (M = 4.10), and politicians exploit cross-border clan loyalties to fuel hostility (M = 4.00). Regression analysis confirmed a significant positive relationship between inter-clan politics and border insecurity (β = 0.365, p < 0.001), with the model explaining 55.5% of the variation in border security (R² = 0.555). Qualitative findings further revealed that political exclusion, historical grievances, and weak integration of traditional governance structures perpetuate insecurity. Conclusion: The study concludes that inter-clan politics is a major driver of insecurity along the Kenya–Somalia border. Sustainable border security requires inclusive governance, equitable resource allocation, strengthened cross-border collaboration, and integration of traditional conflict resolution mechanisms into formal security frameworks to address structural grievances and promote lasting peace in border communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reece et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: