Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The chemical shifts, the spin-lattice relaxation times, the isotropic exchange coupling ̃ \~A, and the pseudo-dipolar exchange coupling ̃ \~B between cation and anion nuclear spins have been determined in a single crystal of CsBr. The results are: σCs=(-1.9±0.4)×10^-4, σBr=(-2.5±0.3)×10^-4, (T₁)Cs=1050±40 sec, (T₁)Br=0.105±0.020 sec, h^-1| ̃ \~A|=55 sec^-1, h^-1 ̃ \~B=15 or -89 sec^-1. Similar, but less complete, data have been obtained for a single crystal of CsI and a CsCl powder.The results are discussed in terms of existing theories for the chemical shift and exchange interactions in solids. An average of 25% covalent bonding per ion is deduced.The large ratio of T₁ for Cs and Br, respectively, sets an upper limit to the quadrupole moment of Cs¹³³: |Q|<0.004×10^-24 cm². This large difference in the spin-lattice interactions between the nuclear species is responsible for some new effects. The decay time T₂ₑ for the transverse Cs¹³³ magnetization is proportional to H₁²(νCs) for a wide power range of the radio-frequency field at the Cs¹³³ Larmor frequency. It is furthermore possible to build up a transverse Cs¹³³ magnetization by applying, simultaneously with H₁(νCs), a radio-frequency field H₁Br(ν) at a frequency ν=νBr±γCsH₁Cs2π. Here νBr is the bromine precession frequency.A theory of these effects shows that the relatively weak interaction constants ̃ \~A and ̃ \~B between cesium and halogen spins can be determined with much higher accuracy than would have been possible from the usual second moment determinations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bloembergen et al. (1958) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: