Why the study?
Does echocardiography reliably estimate left ventricular size and function compared to angiocardiography in infants and children?
Does echocardiography reliably estimate left ventricular size and function compared to angiocardiography in infants and children?
Echocardiography, particularly mean circumferential shortening rate, provides a reliable means of assessing left ventricular function and size in infants and children when compared to angiocardiography.
Echocardiography may support noninvasive LV assessment in infants and children; leaves open prospective outcome validation before routine adoption.
Echocardiography has been shown to be a reliable method for estimating left ventricular size and function in adults, but little attention has been paid to its application to infants and children. This paper describes a validatory study in 40 children aged between 4 days and 16 years. There was a significant correlation between angiocardiographic and echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.76), left ventricular end-systolic volume (r=0.68), and ejection fraction (r=0.73). Left ventricular mean circumferential shortening rate (mean Vcf), however, gave the mostsignificant correlation (r=0.91). These findings indicate that while care must be exercised in interpreting indices of left ventricular size and performance derived from echocardiography, these measurements, and in particular mean Vcf, do offer a useful and reliable means of assessing left ventricular function in infants and children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaye et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: