Why the study?
Current methods for HLA-B27 detection, such as quantitative real-time PCR and flow cytometry, are too time-consuming and labor-intensive, highlighting the need for a rapid diagnostic tool.
Does the BASIC platform accurately and rapidly detect the HLA-B*27 gene compared to qPCR?
Does the BASIC platform accurately and rapidly detect the HLA-B*27 gene compared to qPCR?
The BASIC platform offers a rapid, sensitive, and specific alternative to qPCR for HLA-B*27 gene detection, potentially facilitating early screening for ankylosing spondylitis.
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic, inflammatory arthritis of the spine and peripheral joints which is known to have a strong association with the human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27). Quantitative real-time PCR and flow cytometry are the predominant methods for HLA-B27 gene and antigen, respectively, which are too time-consuming and labor-intensive to realize rapid analysis. Therefore, a rapid diagnostic tool is highly required. In this study, we developed a rapid HLA-B*27 detection platform (namely BASIC) by combining our previously invented BASIS isothermal amplification method with the widely used CRISPR/Cas12a signal output tool. The BASIS can efficiently amplify all HLA-B*27 genotypes by using a set of universal primers, which target the conserved regions. The amplicons are subsequently applied to CRISPR/Cas12a analysis. The CRISPR/Cas12a recognizes the pathogenic HLA-B*27 amplicons specifically by using a well-designed gRNA, thereby achieving fluorescence signal output. Our results showed that the BASIC can be completed in 1 h with analytical sensitivity up to 100 aM. It could resist interference of homologous genes, hemoglobin, bilirubin, and triglyceride. For clinical sample detection, the BASIC offered completely consistent results with qPCR. Given the advantages of sensitivity, specificity, simplicity and rapidity, the BASIC was demonstrated a promising HLA-B*27 gene rapid detection tool for the early screening and diagnosis of AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: