Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 2001Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British VolumeOpen Access

Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JDJill DawsonUniversity of OxfordRFRay FitzpatrickOxford Brookes UniversitySFSteven A. FrostUniversity of Wollongong

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Dawson et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71a55b35aa2c282ce2daefhttps://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b8.11643
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Relationship of Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes to Other Orthopaedic Procedures1997 · 95 citations
  2. 2How Outcome Studies Have Changed Total Hip Arthroplasty Practices in Sweden1997 · 225 citations
  3. 3The Problem of ‘Noise’ in Monitoring Patient-Based Outcomes: Generic, Disease-Specific and Site-Specific Instruments for Total Hip Replacement1996 · 63 citations
  4. 4Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status1989 · 2,412 citations