Why the study?
Does treatment by pediatric surgeons reduce complications in children undergoing appendectomy compared to general surgeons?
Does treatment by pediatric surgeons reduce complications in children undergoing appendectomy compared to general surgeons?
While overall complication rates are similar, pediatric surgeons may achieve lower complication rates than general surgeons in children with complicated appendicitis.
Should not yet change referral patterns; leaves open whether surgeon specialty affects outcomes in complicated pediatric appendicitis.
BACKGROUND: The absence of pediatric surgeons in many centers results in restriction of patient access to pediatric subspecialty care. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of children treated for appendicitis by pediatric surgeons (PS) and by general surgeons (GS). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the charts of all consecutive patients <16 years old who underwent appendectomy during 2 years The primary outcome measure was the overall rate of complications. Secondary outcome measures included length of hospital stay (LOS), symptom duration, time from emergency department diagnosis to surgery, and readmission rate within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients (PS group, n = 66; GS group, n = 28) were included. PS patients were younger. For patients with complicated appendicitis, complications were significantly more prevalent in the GS group (57% vs 15%; P = 0.0001). Median LOS was not significantly different between the two groups for complicated appendicitis, but patients with non-complicated appendicitis had a significant longer LOS when treated by PS (3.74 ± 1.5 vs 2.57 ± 1.21 days; P = 0.0041). Patients in the PS group had a prolonged use of antibiotics (2 vs 4 days; P = 0.001), and longer LOS (3 vs 4 days; P = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: Overall complication rates were similar between PS and GS. Complications were significantly more prevalent in patients with complicated appendicitis who were treated by GS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: