Key result
Conscious sedation is generally favored over general anaesthesia for acute endovascular stroke clot retrieval, with airway protection issues occurring in 2.5% of cases.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endovascular management of acute thrombotic strokes is a new management technique. Anaesthesia will play a key role in the management of these patients. To date there is no established method of managing these patients from an anaesthetic perspective. RECENT FINDINGS: In 2015, five landmark studies popularized intra-arterial clot retrieval for ischaemic strokes. Since then there have been a number of small studies investigating the best anaesthetic technique, taking into account patient, technical, and clinical factors. This review summarizes these studies and discusses the different anaesthetic options, with their relative merits and pitfalls. SUMMARY: There is a paucity of robust evidence for the best anaesthetic practice in this cohort of patients. Airway protection seems to be an issue in 2.5% of cases. Timing of the procedure is vital, and any delay may be detrimental to neurological outcome. In a survey of neurointerventionalists, the main concern they expressed was the potential delay to revascularization posed by anaesthesia. Patients complain of pain during mechanical clot retrieval if awake. The overall consensus seems to be favouring conscious sedation over general anaesthesia in the acute setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijayatilake et al. (2016) conducted a review in Acute thrombotic/ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular management (intra-arterial clot retrieval). Conscious sedation vs. General anaesthesia was evaluated. Conscious sedation is generally favored over general anaesthesia for acute endovascular stroke clot retrieval, with airway protection issues occurring in 2.5% of cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: